Teacher Fired For Student Horseplay

Instead of grading papers, teachers should be on the lookout for "oral sex".

A 3rd grade teacher in Tallulah, Louisiana was fired recently for failing to notice two of her students having “oral sex” under a desk during class.

First question: how do two 3rd graders have “oral sex”?

Since the details of what actually took place under that desk have, understandably, not been released, the only things we have to go on are sensationalized news headlines. Children that age usually do not have a concept of “sex”, let alone “oral sex”. They might explore, play doctor and do things that adults consider “inappropriate”. However, whatever is done is done out of curiosity and sheer obliviousness to what we adults consider right and wrong.

Therefore, there should be a great deal of thought before what happened under that desk is construed as “oral sex”. That term connotes a certain intentionality that 3rd graders just do not have.

Second question: why is the teacher on the hook for this?

According to Lisa Wilmore, Superintendent of Madison Parish School District, “We have to make sure we have people in these classrooms who are monitoring our students”. Fair enough. Two 3rd graders are under a desk doing God knows what. What was the context? Notwithstanding all of the issues around calling what 3rd graders do “oral sex”, how many children were in that classroom? What kind of activity was the class doing? Was it a lecture, group work or some sort of individualized instruction? How many years was this teacher on the job? How much training and support did this teacher get from her administrators?

Most importantly, how is firing this teacher going to ensure that people are in the classrooms properly monitoring students, as this superintendent claims is her goal?

Third question: this is what happens in “right to work states”.

I know this is not a question. Louisiana is a “right to work” state, meaning that employers can hire and fire anyone at will, including public employees, without due process or even a reason. This story is really about one thing, and that is a grandstanding superintendent. Lisa Wilmore is trying to win political points by looking like she is cracking down on incompetent teachers, a very popular thing to do in this day and age.

This is yet another argument in favor of teacher “tenure”. For the millionth and one time, “tenure” does not mean a guaranteed job for life. Tenure is merely a civil service protection to ensure that, if a teacher does get fired, it is for a legitimate reason. These protections ensure that teachers can act as advocates for children without fearing retaliation. They also prevent the teaching profession from becoming a patronage position, a supply of jobs that exist to reward supporters, relatives and other political lickspittles. Lastly, as we see from this story, tenure protects teachers from superintendents and municipal leaders who want to score cheap political points by looking all tough. It would have prevented this teacher from Lisa Wilmore’s meat axe.

Tenure does not exist in “right to work” states and it has been eroded away in every other state. Yet, teachers are expected to ensure student success, supervise the actions of every student in oversized classrooms, notice signs of abuse, provide a nurturing environment, be a shoulder to cry on and essentially play the role of parent, counselor and disciplinarian. All of this while we get bashed in the media, work under outdated contracts and generally are expected to do more with fewer resources.

At the very least, some sort of tenure process in this case of “oral sex” would have generated discussion over the legitimacy of calling anything 8-year-olds do by such a term. Decency and accuracy in the media are sacrificed for the sake of running a salacious headline. They know it works. This is the same media that professed outrage over Bill Clinton’s affair while at the same time providing every last detail. People got on their Puritanical high horses after reading each sordid fact in rapt attention.

If, in fact, two 3rd graders were having “oral sex” under a classroom table, with all of the intentionality that this term connotes, how is the blame not squarely on the shoulders of the parents of these children? What is going on in these children’s homes that they know of such things? How are their parents being held accountable in any way?

When we grow up as a nation, we might actually see that teachers can only work with the children who sit in front of them. Those children are raised not only by their parents, but the communities in which they live and the media to which they are exposed. With headlines like these, is it any wonder that 8-year-olds are doing what they claim they are doing?

Before getting self-righteous over “incompetent” teachers, remember the words from scripture:

“You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

3 responses to “Teacher Fired For Student Horseplay

  1. Actually, all “right to work” means is that closed union shops are not allowed. In other words, workers don’t have to belong to a union yet the union is required to represent ALL workers. The aim of “right to work” is actually to weaken the unions by starving them of dues money. And “post-probationary” status, also (mis)called “tenure,” does exist at least in some of the right-to-work states. Teachers are NOT at-will once post-probationary–they have the “right” to a “due process” hearing and filing grievances and such. I should know because I went through one in Nevada although it was totally rigged by the school district, but then again, so are administrative hearings throughout the United States. The problem isn’t with “tenure” or whatever the equivalent is but instead is the absolute worthlessness of administrative law in protecting the rights of teachers from arbitrary dismissals.

    • From the way the article phrased things, the teacher was dismissed without any due process, no matter how frivolous it is. Of course, there is always more to the story, but it does not look like as if there was even any pretext of a kangaroo court or hearing.

      While you may have had to go through a process, you realize that it is just a sham. Teachers everywhere, of all experience levels, get hired and fired at will no matter what the laws in that state are. The ones that still have civil service protections have done a great job only in providing a cottage industry for arbitrators, lawyers and others who make a living herding experienced teachers out of the system.

  2. All great questions. You are correct about right to work states. In theory it may mean workers do not have to belong to the union to get a job. Further letter and practice is that workers can be fired at will – no reason necessary. This opens up all forms of abuse of the law. What makes me angry is administrators have to feel justified in dragging employees through the mud with exagerated charges of misconduct ruining the employee’s reputation and ability to seek another job or even claim unemployment (there has to be a six month punishment period before the employee can colect).

Assail me some more by leaving a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s