A recent study out of Canada casts doubt on the saintly reputation of Mother Theresa. Their essential thesis is that, despite the fact she took in millions of dollars in donations, the dying people for whom she cared in Calcutta were subjected to horrible conditions. Part of this, they contend, is because Mother Theresa saw beauty in suffering.

The study is really not saying anything Christopher Hitchens did not say many years ago in his documentary Hell’s Angel:

Out of the many convincing arguments Hitchens makes the one that sticks out is that, while primitive and unsanitary conditions were good enough for the people in Calcutta, Mother Theresa herself took advantage of the best medical care the western world had to offer when she got sick. That right there is enough for me to be skeptical of her motives.

To be clear, I do not mean this to be an attack on the Catholic Church. The media hyped her up way before the church did, even though the church did nothing to dispel the hype. If anything, the church saw Mother Theresa as a useful public relations tool to help prop up dreadful church attendance around the world. The blame for Mother Theresa’s undeserved reputation for purity and virtue rest with the media and the woman herself.

Mother Theresa was comfortable hobnobbing with the world’s political and financial elite. She sung Ronald Reagan’s praises, even as he was funding illegal wars in Central America that killed many members of the Catholic Church, including clergy. Her organization pulled in millions of dollars from banksters with questionable ethics, including those associated with the infamous Keating Five. All of her photo-ops provided moral cover to people who killed, swindled and oppressed millions.

What I say here is unpopular and will most likely offend many true believers. It really is no different from the way the education debate goes in this country. The media seizes upon people associated with the elite, like Michelle Rhee for example. They attribute to her selfless motives in trying to “help” some of the most downtrodden people in society. Meanwhile, what she provides to those downtrodden people is of questionable value. The question arises: what happened with all of those millions if it is obviously not going to help people?

Yet, even suggesting such a question will elicit a fair share of vitriol. How dare we question people who have made it their life’s mission to help people? We must have our own selfish motivations. Either we are anti-religious bigots of union hacks who fear accountability.

The fact that so many believe the hype about something is the biggest reason why we should be skeptical. Instead of falling into line because it is the popular thing to do, we need to be the voice in the wilderness that brings people back down to earth. Otherwise, we run the risk of group-think, tyranny of the majority and out-and-out mob rule.

Both Mother Theresa and the education reformers want for other, usually poor, people things of which they do not avail themselves. If that does not raise a red flag then nothing will.


  1. Hitch’s book Missionary Position makes his case quite clearly that the good sister was a lot less than the church and its adherents would like us all to believe. Right off the bat one of her so called miracles was disproved with simple medical records showing the fraud in her claims of the illness she was allegedly cured of. She also found it in her heart to overlook Diana Spencer’s divorce from Prince Chuck yet heaven help the Calcutta slum dweller who thought they’d ever get such an indulgence. Classic Catholic double standard of granting indulgences to the rich and powerful that the slob at the end of the pew living check to check had better understand was not going to be their lot in life. And who the hell is anyone trying to kid when billionaires are suddenly drawn to education by the likes of Rhee and her fellow privatization pimps. Before Bill Press became tipsy from the bottle of Neo Liberalism and started hauling Randi Slimegarten out every month or so as a union firebrand I spoke with Hitchens on the air. It took up about 2 minutes of my fame. I am hoping to make the best of the remaining 13.

    • Nice, you actually got to speak with the Hitch? Now I am jealous. I will never have that opportunity.

      Both the good mother and the bad Rhee-former made/make it their stock-in-trade to grovel at the feet of the rich and powerful while the poor get overcrowding and poor services. When the media labels one a saint, you know something is amiss.

Assail me some more by leaving a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s