A GENERAL STRATEGY?

Perhaps this might help with surviving the school apocalypse.

Perhaps this might help with surviving the school apocalypse.

Two of the keys to victory in this amorphous war over public education are being religiously practiced by the progressive Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.

The first key to victory lies in their website. Every paragraph is festooned with reformy language. Their aims seem to be indistinguishable from those of Students First or any other privatizer-friendly “research council”. By speaking in glittering generalities in order to hide their agendas, the reformy crowd has thrown out the rope by which they will eventually hang.

Everyone is for “improved outcomes” and “bridging the achievement gap”. The incessant need for reformers to assure us of their genuine desire to accomplish these things have made these terms tropes with no real meaning. Any group, organization or movement can slip snugly under the covers of this rhetoric to hide their own respective agendas.

The public has become so accustomed to these terms that no organization who hopes to truly affect education policy can afford to not use them. “Closing the achievement gap”, for example, is an idea that a deft rhetorician can use to mean equalizing resources among all schools around the country, just like the reformers usually use it to mean boosting test scores.

In the end, all it really takes is for us to repeat and aver the purity of our intentions  using these terms as frequently as the reformy crowd.

Of course, this rhetorical approach should be coupled by truly progressive action. Annenberg recently kicked off an initiative called A+ NYC aimed at lobbying the mayoral candidates in the name of what parents want for public schools. They recently sent a battered school bus around the city to reach parents who wanted to share their voices.

Not surprisingly, the biggest concerns turned out to be the disappearance of extracurricular activities and over-reliance on testing. This is a far cry from the manufactured clamoring of parents for more charter schools. It goes a long way towards explaining why Eva Moskowitz and her ilk have to get signatures of out-of-district parents to petition for charter schools.

What really needs to be done, and what Annenberg seems on the verge of suggesting, is the creation of the idea of parents as voting blocs. Parents are used to having their names invoked whenever one group or another wants to push some sort of privatization or censorship. Yet, they have never truly been framed as a voting bloc.

A voting bloc needs to be united behind at least one common idea. For parents, “great schools” are not enough, since that is a trope and not an idea. This is where the reformers fail and from whence the next great school movement has to start. Parents as a voting bloc must be connected to the idea of a “better school day”. An idea like this, on which the Chicago teachers put their fingers during their strike, is general enough to unite a wide swath of parents while having enough specific connotations to mean something.

And these specific connotations would be decidedly at odds with the reformy agenda. Instead of equalizing “outcomes”, the focus needs to shift towards equalizing resources. What will be important is what we as a society put into the schools, not what we can get out of the schools in terms of trained labor, higher test scores and no-bid contracts.

Who would be able to argue against an idea that wants great schools for all children?

Discarding the vapid terminology utilized by the reformies is a mistake. Instead, true public school advocates have to flay the reformer beast and walk around wearing its skin.

Advertisements

2 responses to “A GENERAL STRATEGY?

  1. I’ve been familiar with Annenberg stuff for well over a decade. Norm Fruchter and ilk. They were reformy before there was a reformy movement. Focus on leaving teachers out of the debate. But once they began to see the impact they shifted. Problem is they are also funding astroturf groups which I guess is OK but ultimate problem is their alliance and dependence on the UFT. They rarely stray though they actually sided with the Occupy people at the PEP where the UFT threatened not to show.
    No matter how hard you push them they will not take a hard position on charters and pretty much tow the UFT line on that. Ask them about where they stand on the UFT charter co-locos and watch them run.
    But they are allies in this struggle and in some ways so is the Unity UFT leadership which some people think would begin to move toward more activism if MORE gets enough of a vote out of the school divisions to make a dent and a threat that the next time there is an election they will truly have to run from a threat. Don’t get me wrong, as long as the retirees can dominate they cannot lose control but where they are vulnerable long term is at the school level. If MORE can capture chapter leaderships over the next 2 years that will change the nature of the DA.

  2. Assailed Teacher

    In that case, it seems Annenberg may be inadvertantly pointing the way towards a winning formula. Progressive education activists need to coopt the rhetoric of reform and subtly stretch its meaning to refer to equalzing resources instead of results.

    At the same time, we need to mobilize parents as a voting bloc so that they will elect local candidates who truly defend public education. This would solidify progressive policy for a long time.

    I was going to give credit to the UFT for being part of the A+NYC initiative but it seems that they got involved out of necessity. After all, how could they NOT join the when groups like Students First are out to destroy them?

    If a more progressive movement takes the Annenberg formula a step further in the direction of true public school advocacy and grass-roots mobilization, I forsee success.

Assail me some more by leaving a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s